A COMPARISON OF PARAMETER ESTIMATES OF NON-LINEAR GROWTH MODEL IN DIFFERENT CHICKEN BREEDS USING BAYESIAN APPROACH WITH NORMAL DISTRIBUTION DATA

Authors

  • Olugbenga Abe Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36547/sjas.979

Keywords:

bertalanffy, exotic chicken, gompertz, non-linear model, probability, logistic, richards

Abstract

Bayesian statistics is a system for describing epistemological uncertainty using the mathematical language of probability while growth models provide valuable information for livestock improvement programmes and decision making. In this study, the ability of four non-linear growth models (gompertz, logistic, richards and bertalanffy) to predict the growth of three indigenous breeds (normal feathered, frizzle feathered and naked neck chickens), one locally developed crossbred chicken (FUNAAB Alpha) and three exotic breeds (nera black, white leghorn and giriraja) were evaluated. Data for body weight were collected every week from 993 bird for 20 weeks. The non-linear growth models were used to fit the body weight data using Bayesian approach under normal distribution data. The parameters in the models; asymptotic weight, integration constant, maturing rate, age at inflection point and weight at inflection point for the lLogistic, gompertz, richards and bertalanffy growth models were estimated for each breed using WinBUGS (version 1.4.3) to read the model, priors and posterior data, and run the Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation (MCMC). The models were adjusted for best fit using Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). The results showed that bertalanffy model had the lowest maturing rate (0.07, 0.08, 0.08, 0.06, 0.05, 0.07 and 0.08) and predicted the highest asymptotic weight (2104.50g, 1963.00g, 1821.75g, 2668.50g, 3167.00g, 2269.50g and 3326.00g) among the models for naked neck, frizzle feather, normal feather, FUNAAB Alpha, near black, white leghorn and giriraja chickens respectively. The parameter estimates in gompertz and richards models were relatively close within the breed compared to other models with a variation difference of between 1.5 and 2.0% while between 8.3 and 10.0% was recorded within FUNAAB Alpha and nera black. The bertalanffy according to the values obtained in Bayesian information criterion had the least value for all the breeds. In conclusion, Bayesian model should be given consideration in growth decision making and selection program relating to the breeds considered in this study.

References

Aggrey, S. E. (2002). Comparison of three nonlinear and spline regression models for describing chicken growth curves. Poultry Science, 81(12), 1782-1788.

Bernardo, J.M. and Rueda, R. (2002). Bayesian hypothesis testing: A reference approach. International Statistical Review, 70: 351-372.

Braccini, N.J. (1993). Genetic study of growth curves of laying birds (dissertation) Federal University of Pelotas. pp: 89.

Eleroglu, H., Yildirim, A., Sekeroglu, A., Coksoyler, F.N. and Duman, M. (2014). Comparison of growth curves by growth models in slow-growing chicken genotypes raised the organic system. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 16: 529-535

Firat, M.Z., Karaman, E., Basar, E.K. and Narinc, D. (2016). Bayesian analysis for the comparison of nonlinear regression model parameters: An application to the growth of Japanese Quail. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, SI; 19-26

France, J., Dijkstra, J., & Dhanoa, M. S. (1996). Growth functions and their application in animal science. Annales de Zootechnie, 45(Suppl1),165-174.

Franco, D., García, A., Vázquez, J. A., Fernández, M., Carril, J. A., & Lorenzo, J. M. (2011). Curva de crecimiento de la raza cerco celta (subrariedad barcina) a diferentes edades de sacrifício. Actas Iberoamericanas de Conservacíon Animal, 1(1), 259-263.

Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S and Rubin, D. B. (2003). Bayesian data analysis. 1st Edition. Chapman and Hall/CRCX. Pp: 1-7

Hagan, B.A, Asumah, C., Yeboah, E.D. and Lamptey, V.K. (2022). Modeling the growth of four commercial broiler genotypes reared in the tropics. Trop Anim Health Prod., 54(1):75.

Hall, S.J.G. and Bradley, D.G. (1995). Conserving Livestock Breed Biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10, 267-270.

Hornik, K. 2013. The R FAQ http://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html.

https://typeset.io/questions/what-is-asymptotic-weight-in-animal-growth-curve-3k6mdst11a

Ibáñez-Escriche, N. and Blasco, A. (2011). Modifying growth curve parameters by multitrait genomic selection. J Anim Sci 89: 661-668

Kizilkaya, K., Balcioglu, M.S., Yolcu, H.I., Karabag, K. and Genc, I.H. 2006. Growth curve analysis using nonlinear mixed model in divergently selected Japanese quails. Arch. Geflugelkd. 70(4): 181-186.

Lenhard, J. (2022). A transformation of Bayesian statistics: Computation, prediction, and rationality. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 92; 144-151

Mansano, C.F.M., Stéfani, M.V., Pereira, M.M. and Macente, B.I. (2013). Deposição de nutrientes na carcaça de girinos de rã-touro. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 48(8), 885-891.

Nahashon, S.N., Aggrey, S.E., Adefope, N.A., Amenyenu, A. and Wright, D. (2006). Growth characteristics of pearl gry guniea fowl as predicted by the Richards, Gompertz and Logistic models. Poultry Science, 85: 359-363

Narinc, D., Karaman, E., Firat, M. Z. and Aksoy, T. (2010). Comparison of non-linear growth models to describe the growth in Japanese quail. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 9: 1961-1966.

Ogunpaimo, O., Mathew, W., Ojoawo, H., Adebambo, O.O., Adebambo, O.A., Durosaro, S. (2020). Use of growth models to predict the body weight of FUNAAB Alpha chicken, its crossbreds and two other exotic chickens at early stage of growth. FUDMA Journal of Sciences. 4. 686 - 696.

SAS Institute Inc. (2000). The SAS system for Windows. Released 8.2. SAS Inst., Cary, NC. Sci. 73:395–408.

Sengul, T. and Kiraz, S. (2005). Non-linear models for growth curves in large white turkeys. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 29, 331-337.

Spiegelhalter, D.J. and Rice, K. (2009), Bayesian statistics. Scholarpedia, 4(8):5230

Spiegelhalter, D.J., Best, N.G., Carlin B.P. and van der Linde, A. (2002), “Bayesian Measures of Complexity and Fit.” J. Royal Stat. Soc. 64: 583–639.

Spiegelhalter, D.J., Thomas, A., Best, N.G. and Lunn, D. (2003), “WinBUGS Version 1.4

Teleken, J.T., Galvao, A.C. and Robazza, W.S. 2017. Comparing non-linear mathematical models to describe growth of different animals. Acta Scientiarum, 39(1): 73-81

Tholon P. and Queiroz S.A. (2007). Models for the analysis of growth curves for rearing tinamous (Rhynchotus rufescens) in captivity. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 9(1): 23 - 31

Zhao, Z.H., Li, S.F., Huang, H.Y., Li, C.M., Wang, Q.B. and Xue, L.G. (2015). Comparative study on growth and developmetal mpdel of indigenous chickesn in China. Open journal of Animal Science, 5: 219-223

Downloads

Published

2025-09-17