DISTRIBUTION OF LEUCOCYTES AND EPITHELIAL CELLS IN SHEEP MILK IN RELATION TO THE SOMATIC CELL COUNT AND BACTERIAL OCCURRENCE: A PRELIMINARY STUDY

Authors

  • Jaromír Vašíček NPPC – Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Lužianky, Slovak Republic; Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Nitra, Slovak Republic https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4144-8584
  • Kristína Tvarožková Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Nitra, Slovak Republic
  • Michal Uhrinčať NPPC – Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Lužianky, Slovak Republic
  • Lucia Mačuhová NPPC – Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Lužianky, Slovak Republic
  • Lukáš Hleba Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Nitra, Slovak Republic
  • Vladimír Tančin NPPC – Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Lužianky, Slovak Republic; Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Nitra, Slovak Republic

Keywords:

sheep, milk, SCC, bacteria, leukocytes, flow cytometry

Abstract

Milk somatic cell count (SCC) is a main indicator of udder health in dairy animals. Thus, increased SCC levels are usually associated with the clinical and/or subclinical intramammary infections. SCC are mainly composed of immune cells (leukocytes) and epithelial cells. Recently, several flow cytometric approaches were used to assess the distribution of these cells in the milk of ewes. Hereby, a new combined antibody panel was designed for this purpose. Briefly, milk cells were stained with specific antibodies: CD18 (leukocytes), CD21 (B cells), CD4 (Th cells), CD8 (Tc cells), CD14 (monocytes) and CD11b (polymorphonuclear cells – PMNs). CD18 negative cells were considered as epithelial cells. Moreover, a qualitative examination of bacteria species presented in the milk was carried out using MALDI-TOF MS. Analysed milk samples were divided into 5 classes according to the SCC number as follows: < 300,000 cells.ml-1 (SCC1), 300,000-500,000 cells.ml-1 (SCC2), 501,000-1,000,000 cells.ml-1 (SCC3), 1,001,000-2,000,000 cells.ml-1 (SCC4) and > 2,000,000 cells.ml-1 (SCC5). SCC1-2 samples were considered as normal milk samples, whereas SCC3-5 as abnormal samples. Bacteriological assessment revealed that all samples in SCC3-5 class were infected mainly by S. epidermidis and S. caprae. On the other hand, SCC2 did not exhibit a pathogen infection and in SCC1 only 22 % of samples were infected. Concerning the somatic cell composition, SCC1-2 classes comprised approximately 50:50 of leukocytes and epithelial cells. The main leukocyte subsets were PMNs. However, the number of leukocytes alongside with PMNs count significantly (P < 0.05) increased in SCC3, whereas the number of epithelial cells significantly (P < 0.05) decreased compared to SCC1-2. Similar trend, although not significant, was observed in SCC4-5 samples. The proportion of nonviable PMNs also increased (P < 0.05) in SCC3, however it was not markedly different in comparison to live PMNs among all SCC classes. In conclusion, described methodological approach could be effective in the more detail further research dealing with distribution of different cells of different origin (epithelial, leukocytes) in cases of subclinical mastitis caused by different mastitis pathogens.

References

Albenzio, M., & Caroprese, M. (2011). Differential leucocyte count for ewe milk with low and high somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Research, 78(1), 43–48. https://doi:10.1017/S0022029910000798


Albenzio, M., Santillo, A., Caroprese, M., Ruggieri, D., Ciliberti, M., & Sevi, A. (2012). Immune competence of the mammary gland as affected by somatic cell and pathogenic bacteria in ewes with subclinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(7), 3877–3887. https://doi:10.3168/jds.2012-5357.


Bagnicka, E., Winnicka, A., Jóźwik, A., Rzewuska, M., Strzałkowska, N., Kościuczuk, E., Prusak, B., Kaba, J., Horbańczuk, J., & Krzyżewski, J. (2011). Relationship between somatic cell count and bacterial pathogens in goat milk. Small Ruminant Research, 100(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.04.014.


Boulaaba, A., Grabowski, N., & Klein, G. (2011). Differential cell count of caprine milk by flow cytometry and microscopy. Small Ruminant Research, 97(1-3), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.02.002


Dosogne, H., Vangroenweghe, F., Mehrzad, J., Massart-Leen, A. M., & Burvenich, C. (2003). Differential leukocyte count method for bovine low somatic cell count milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 86(3), 828–834. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73665-0


Gonzalo, C., Carriedo, J. A., Baro, J. A., & Primitivo, F. (1994). Factors influencing variation of test day milk-yield, somatic cell count, fat and protein in dairy sheep. Journal of Dairy Science, 77(6), 1537–1542. https://10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77094-6


Holko, I., Tančin, V., Tvarožková, K., Supuka, P., Supuková, A., & Mačuhová, L. (2019). Occurence and antimicrobial resistance of common udder pathogens isolated from sheep milk in Slovakia. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 13(1), 258–261. https://doi.org/10.5219/1067


Kern, G., Traulsen, I., Kemper, N., & Krieter, J. (2013). Analysis of somatic cell counts and risk factors associated with occurrence of bacteria in ewes of different primary purposes. Livestock Science, 157(2-3), 597–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.09.008


Leitner, G., Chaffer, M., Shamay, A., Shapiro, F., Merin, U., Ezra, E., Saran, A., & Silanikove, N. (2004). Changes in milk composition as affected by subclinical mastitis in sheep. Journal of Dairy Science, 87(1), 46–52. http://10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73140-9


Leitner, G., Merin, U., Krifucks, O., Blum, S., Rivas, A. L., & Silanikove, N. (2012). Effects of intra-mammary bacterial infection with coagulase negative staphylococci and stage of lactation on shedding of epithelial cells and infiltration of leukocytes into milk: Comparison among cows, goats and sheep. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 147(3-4), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2012.04.019


Li, N., Richoux, R., Perruchot, M. H., Boutinaud, M., Mayol, J. F., & Gagnaire, V. (2015). Flow Cytometry Approach to Quantify the Viability of Milk Somatic Cell Counts after Various Physico-Chemical Treatments. PLoS ONE, 10(12), e0146071. https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146071


Maurer, J., & Schaeren, W. (2007). Udder health and somatic cell counts in ewes. Agrarforschung Schweiz, 14(4), 162-167. Retrieved from https://www.agrarforschungschweiz.ch/artikel/download.php?filename=2007_04_1266.pdf


Mehne, D., Drees, S., Schuberth, H. J., Sauter-Louis, C., Zerbe, H., & Petzl, W. (2010). Accurate and rapid flow cytometric leukocyte differentiation in low and high somatic cell count milk. Milchwissenschaft, 65(3), 235.


Paape, M. J. & Wiggans, G. R., Bannerman, D. D., Thomas, D. L., Sanders, A. H., Contreras, A., Moroni, P., & Miller, R. H. Monitoring goat and sheep milk somatic cell counts. Small Ruminant Research, 68(1-2), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.09.014


Persson, Y., Nyman, A. K., Söderquist, L., Tomic, N., & Waller, K. P. (2017). Intramammary infections and somatic cell counts in meat and pelt producing ewes with clinically healthy udders. Small Ruminant Research, 156, 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2017.09.012


Rupp, R., Lagriffoul, G., Astruc, J. M., & Barillet, F. (2003). Genetic parameters for milk somatic cell scores and relationships with production traits in French Lacaune dairy sheep. Journal of Dairy Science, 86(4), 1476–1481. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73732-1


Sarikaya, H., Prgomet, C., Pfaffl, M. W., & Bruckmaier, R. M. (2004). Differentiation of leukocytes in bovine milk. Milchwissenschaft, 59(11/12), 586–589. https://eurekamag.com/research/004/107/004107892.php


Silanikove, N., Shapiro, F., Leitner, G., & Merin, U. (2005). Subclinical mastitis affects the plasmin system, milk composition and curd yield in sheep and goats: comparative aspects. Mastitis in Dairy Production. Wageningen Academic Press Publishers, The Netherlands, 511–516.


Shosahni, E., Leitner, G., Hanochi, B., Saran, A., Shpigel, N. Y., & Berman, A. (2000). Mammary infection with Staphylococcus aureus in cows: progress from inoculation to chronic infection and its detection. Journal of Dairy Research, 67(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002202990000412X


Souza, F. N., Blagitz, M. G., Penna, C. F. A. M., Della Libera, A. M. M. P., Heinemann, M. B., & Cerqueira, M. M. O. P. (2012). Somatic cell count in small ruminants: Friend or foe? Small Ruminant Research, 107(2-3), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.04.005


Świderek, W., Charon, K., Winnicka, A., Gruszczyńska, J., & Pierzchała, M. (2016). Physiological Threshold of Somatic Cell Count in Milk of Polish Heath Sheep and Polish Lowland Sheep. Annals of Animal Science,16(1), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2015-0071


Tančin, V., Bauer, M., Holko, I., & Baranovič, Š. (2016). Etiology of mastitis in ewes and possible genetic and epigenetic factors involved. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, 49(2), 85–93. Retrieved from http://www.cvzv.sk/slju/16_2/tancin.pdf


Tančin, V., Holko, I., Vršková, M., Uhrinčať, M., & Mačuhová, L. (2017). Relationship between presence of mastitis pathogens and somatic cell count in milk of ewes. XLVII. Lenfeldovy a Höklovy dny. Brno: Veterinární a farmaceutická univerzita, 230–233. ISBN 978-80-7305-793-0.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-17

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>