SPERM MOTILITY OF RAMS FROM TWO SLOVAK SHEEP BREEDS: SHORT COMMUNICATION

Authors

  • Daniel Buša Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Nitra, Slovak Republic
  • Marián Macháč Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Nitra, Slovak Republic
  • Andrej Baláži NPPC – Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Lužianky, Slovak Republic
  • Andrea Svoradová NPPC – Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Lužianky, Slovak Republic
  • Jaromír Vašíček Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Nitra, Slovak Republic; NPPC – Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Lužianky, Slovak Republic
  • Rastislav Jurčík Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Nitra, Slovak Republic; NPPC – Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Lužianky, Slovak Republic
  • Peter Chrenek Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Nitra, Slovak Republic; NPPC – Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Lužianky, Slovak Republic

Keywords:

slovak rams, sperm, quality, motility, morphology

Abstract

In the present study, fresh ram sperm samples (n = 52) from the Native Wallachian (NW; n = 26) and Improved Wallachian (IW; n = 26) Slovak sheep breeds were collected from males of each breed by electro-ejaculation and analysed for motility using CASA and morphology using light microscopy assessment. Our results showed no significant differences between the breeds (P ≤ 0.05) in the sperm concentration and motility traits (Table 1). Also both these ram groups did not differ (P ≤ 0.05) in sperm morphology parameters (Table 2). Since, this is only preliminary research, additional experiments using higher number of samples (rams) as well as other evaluation approaches are required in order to compare sperm characteristics for different breeds.

References

AX, R. L., DALLY, M., DIDION, B. A., LENZ, R. W., LOVE, C. C., VARNER, D. D., HAFEZ, B. & BELLIN, M. E. (2016). Asisted Reproductive Technology: Semen Evaluation. Reproduction of Farm Animals. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, p. 363–375. ISBN 978-11-192-6530-6.


DAVID, I., ROBERT-GRANIÉ, C., MANFREDI, E., LAGRIFFOUL, G. & BODIN, L. (2008). Environmental and genetic variation factors of artificial insemination success in French dairy sheep. Animal, 2, 979–986.


CHRENEK, P., MAKAREVICH, A. V., KUBOVICOVA, E., BULLA, J. & SUPUKA, P. (2019). Slovak National Animal Breeds. Nitra: Slovak University of Agriculture. p. 16–20. ISBN 978-80-552-1982-0.


KUBOVICOVA, E., MAKAREVICH, A. V., SPALEKOVA, E. & HEGEDUSOVA, Z. (2011). Motility and fertilizing ability of frozen-thawed ram sperm from two sheep breeds. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, 2011, 44(4), 134–139.


KULIKOVA, B., BALAZI, A., TOTHOVA, J., JURCIK, R.,HUBA, J. & CHRENEK, P. (2018). Dilution factor affects the ability of ram sperm to survive cryopreservation: Short communication. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, 51(1), 41–44.


KULAKSIZ, R., CEBI, C. & AKCAY, E. (2012). The effect of different extenders on the motility and morphology of ram sperm frozen or stored at 4 °C. The Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 36(2), 177–182.


MAROTO-MORALES, A., RAMON, M., GARCIA-ALVAREZ, O., SOLER, A. J., ESTESTO, M. C., MARTINEZ-PASTOR, F., PEREZ-GUZMAN, M. D. & GARDE, J. J. (2010). Characterization of ram (Ovis aries) sperm head morphometry using the sperm-class analyzer. Theriogenology, 73(4), 437–448.


O'HARA, L., HANRAHAN, J. P., RICHARDSON, L., DONOVAN, A., FAIR, S., EVANS, A. C. O. & LONERGAN, P. (2010). Effect of storage duration, storage temperature, and diluent on the viability and fertility of fresh ram sperm. Theriogenology, 73(4), 541–549.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-18

Issue

Section

Short Communication

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>